Statement of Accreditation Status

Bryn Athyn College of the New Church

  • CEO: Mr. Brian Blair, President
  • Accreditation Liaison Officer: Mr. Kai Howard
  • Commission Staff Liaison: Dr. Sean McKitrick, Vice President
  • Carnegie Classification: Baccalaureate Colleges: Arts & Sciences Focus » Four-year, very small, highly residential
  • Control: Private (Non-Profit)
  • Former Name(s): Academy of the New Church College and Theological School
  • Phase: Accredited
  • Status: Non-Compliance Warning
  • Accreditation Granted: 1952
  • Last Reaffirmation: 2013
  • Next Self-Study Evaluation: 2029-2030

Contact Information

P. O. Box 717 2965 College Drive
Bryn Athyn, PA 19009-0717

(267) 502-2400

www.brynathyn.edu

  • June 23, 2022
    To acknowledge receipt of the self-study report. To note that the institution hosted a virtual site visit in lieu of an on-site visit in accordance with the United States Department of Education (USDE) guidelines published March 17, 2020. To warn the institution that its accreditation may be in jeopardy because of insufficient evidence that the institution is currently in compliance with Standard I (Mission and Goals) and VII (Governance, Leadership, and Administration). To note that the institution remains accredited while on warning. To note further that federal regulations limit the period during which an institution may be in non-compliance. To request a monitoring report due March 1, 2023, demonstrating evidence that the institution has achieved and can sustain ongoing compliance with Standards I and VII, including but not limited to (1) how its mission is linked to institutional goals and how such linkages guide institutional stakeholders in planning and decision making (Standard I) and (2) a governance structure that allows it to realize its stated mission and goals in a way that benefits the institution, its students and the constituencies it serves (Standard VII). To request that the monitoring report also provide further evidence documenting (1) the development and implementation of organized and systematic assessments that evaluate the extent of student achievement (Standard V); (2) demonstrated and documented use of assessment results to improve educational effectiveness (Standard V); (3) enrollment management planning linked to budget development (Standard VI); and (4) the development and implementation of organized and systematic assessments that evaluate institutional effectiveness (Standard VI). To direct a follow-up team visit following submission of the monitoring report. To note the visit may also fulfill the verification requirements of the USDE guidelines. To direct a prompt Commission liaison guidance visit to discuss the Commission's expectations. Upon reaffirmation of accreditation, the next evaluation visit is scheduled for 2029-2030.
  • February 27, 2020
    To acknowledge receipt of the substantive change request. To include the second alternative delivery method-distance education program (Master of Arts in Religious Studies) within the institution's scope of accreditation. To note that the Commission may rescind this action if the requested substantive change is not implemented within one calendar year from the date of this action. The next evaluation visit is scheduled for 2021-2022.
  • February 27, 2020
    To acknowledge receipt of the substantive change request. To include the first Post-baccalaureate Certificate in Language-Based Learning Disability & Intervention Studies within the institution's scope of accreditation. To note the Commission may rescind this action if the requested substantive change is not implemented within one calendar year from the date of this action. The next evaluation visit is scheduled for 2021-2022.
  • April 30, 2019
    To acknowledge receipt of the substantive change request. To include the first alternative delivery method-distance education program (MS in Special Education with Literacy Concentration) within the institution's scope of accreditation. To note that the Commission may rescind this action if the requested substantive change is not implemented within one calendar year from the date of this action. The next evaluation visit is scheduled for 2021-2022.
  • March 14, 2019
    To note that the Mid-Point Peer Review has been conducted. To request that, beginning in 2019 and in conjunction with each Annual Institutional Update prior to the self-study visit in 2021-2022, the institution provide further evidence of adequate fiscal and human resources, including physical and technical infrastructure, to support operations (Standard VI).
  • November 20, 2014
    To accept the monitoring report. The Periodic Review Report is due June 1, 2018.
  • June 27, 2013
    To reaffirm accreditation. To commend the institution for progress to date and for the quality of the self study process. To request a monitoring report, due October 1, 2014, documenting further development of (1) a comprehensive financial contingency plan (Standard 3); (2) a faculty handbook approved by the college and the board of trustees (Standard 4); (3) a detailed and comprehensive assessment plan, including student learning and performance outcomes, for all academic support, advisement, and student life services and programs (Standard 9). The Periodic Review Report is due June 1, 2018.
  • November 17, 2011
    To accept the monitoring report, to note the visit by the Commission’s representatives, to remove the warning, and to reaffirm accreditation. To request that the self-study, in preparation for the next evaluation visit in 2012-2013, document and evaluate (1) the final position descriptions of the Vice Chancellor and Treasurer of the Board (Standard 4), (2) implementation of the Faculty Council (Standard 4), and (3) the appointment of a chief financial officer for the College (Standard 5). To remind the institution of the Commission's request that the self-study document ongoing implementation of organized and sustained processes to assess institutional, program-level, and general education goals, including direct evidence of student learning (Standards 7 and 14).
  • June 23, 2011
    To note the visit by the Commission's representative. To remind the institution of the warning that its accreditation may be in jeopardy because of a lack of evidence that the institution is in compliance with Standards 4 (Leadership & Governance) and 5 (Administration), and that the institution remains accredited while on warning. To further remind the institution of the monitoring report, due September 1, 2011, documenting compliance with these standards, and that it should include, but not be limited to, documented evidence of (1) an empowering document delineating the authority and duties of the president of the college (Standards 4 and 5), (2) board by-laws that clearly assign appropriate authority for policy development and decision making to the president of the college (Standards 4 and 5), (3) that the Theological School is brought entirely under the authority of the president of the college (Standards 4 and 5), (4) an authorized and operative Faculty Council (Standard 4), and (5) clear position descriptions and stated responsibilities of key officers of the Academy of the New Church, the president of the college, and key leaders of the college (Standard 5). A small team visit will follow submission of the monitoring report. The next evaluation visit remains scheduled for 2012-2013, pending Commission reaffirmation of accreditation. To remind the institution of the Commission's request that the self-study, in preparation for the next evaluation visit, document ongoing implementation of organized and sustained processes to assess institutional, program-level, and general education goals, including direct evidence of student learning (Standards 7 and 14).
  • March 3, 2011
    To accept the monitoring report, and to note the visit by the Commission’s representatives. To warn the institution that its accreditation may be in jeopardy because of a lack of evidence that the institution is in compliance with Standards 4 (Leadership & Governance) and 5 (Administration). To note that the institution remains accredited while on warning. To request a monitoring report, due September 1, 2011, documenting compliance with these standards. To request that the monitoring report include, but not be limited to, documented evidence of (1) an empowering document delineating the authority and duties of the president of the college (Standards 4 and 5), (2) board by-laws that clearly assign appropriate authority for policy development and decision making to the president of the college (Standards 4 and 5), (3) that the Theological School is brought entirely under the authority of the president of the college (Standards 4 and 5), (4) an authorized and operative Faculty Council (Standard 4), and (5) clear position descriptions and stated responsibilities of key officers of the Academy of the New Church, the president of the college, and key leaders of the college (Standard 5). A small team visit will follow submission of the monitoring report. To direct an immediate Commission liaison guidance visit to discuss the Commission’s expectations. The next evaluation visit remains scheduled for 2012-2013, pending Commission reaffirmation of accreditation. To remind the institution of the Commission’s request that the self-study, in preparation for the next evaluation visit, document ongoing implementation of organized and sustained processes to assess institutional, program-level, and general education goals, including direct evidence of student learning (Standards 7 and 14).
  • Distance Education
    Approved to offer programs by this delivery method
  • Correspondence Education
    Not approved for this delivery method

Approved Credential Levels

The following represents credential levels included in the scope of the institution’s accreditation:

  • Associate's Degree or Equivalent Included within the scope:
  • Bachelor's Degree or Equivalent Included within the scope:
  • Post-baccalaureate Certificate Included within the scope:
  • Master's Degree or Equivalent Included within the scope:

The following are links to sites that are not maintained by the MSCHE. These are provided as additional external resources about each institution that the MSCHE accredits.