STATEMENT OF ACCREDITATION STATUS
YORK COLLEGE OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
94-20 Guy R. Brewer Boulevard
Jamaica, NY 11451
Phone: (718) 262-2000; Fax: (718) 262-2352
|Chief Executive Officer:||Dr. Marcia Keizs, President|
|System:||City University of New York Central Administration|
|Dr. William P. Kelly, Interim Chancellor
535 E. 80th Street
New York, NY 10021
Phone: (212) 794-5555; Fax: (212) 794-5590
8381 Undergraduate; 39 Graduate
|Carnegie Classification:||Baccalaureate - Diverse Fields|
|Degrees Offered:||Postsecondary Certificate (< 1 year), Postsecondary Certificate (>=1 year, < 2 years), Bachelor's, Master's;|
|Distance Education Programs:||No|
|Accreditors Approved by U.S. Secretary of Education: American Occupational Therapy Association, Accreditation Council for Occupational Therapy Education; National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education; National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission|
|Other Accreditors: Commission on Education for the Physician Assistant (ARC-PA) ; Council on Social Work Education ; National Accrediting Agency for Clinical Laboratory Sciences (NAACLS) (Status: The self-study has been submitted and the site visit is in October)|
|Branch Campuses: None|
|Additional Locations: None|
|Other Instructional Sites: Academy of Medical Technology, Queens, NY; August Martin High, Queens, NY; Aviation HS, Queens, NY; Bard HS, Queens, NY; Bayside, Bayside, NY; Beach Channel, Queens, NY; Bedford Academy, Brooklyn, NY; Benjamin Cardozo, Bayside, NY; Boys & Girls HS, Brooklyn, NY; Brooklyn Academy HS, Brooklyn, NY; Brooklyn HS for the Arts, Brooklyn, NY; Dr. Susan S McKinney Secondary School of the Arts, Brooklyn, NY; Edward R Murrow HS, Brooklyn, NY; Excelsior, Jamaica, NY; Fiorello Laguardia, New York, NY; Fordham HS for the Arts, Bronx, NY; Forest Hills, Forest Hills, NY; Francis Lewis, Fresh Meadows, NY; Frank Sinatra, Queens, NY; Frederick Douglas Academy VI, Queens, NY; Frederick Douglass Academy, New York, NY; George Washington Carver HS for Sciences, Jamaica, NY; Hillcrest H.S., Jamaica, NY; HS for Contruction Trades, Engineering & Architecture, Ozone Park, NY; HS for Law Enforcement, Queens, NY; Hunter College HS, New York, NY; Institute for Collaborative Education, New York, NY; International HS @ Lafayette, Brooklyn, NY; International HS @ LaGuardia C.C., Queens, NY; John Adams High School, Ozone Park, NY; John Bowne HS, Queens, NY; KIPP NYC College Prep, New York, NY; Magnet School For Humanities & Arts, New York, NY; Martin Van Buren, Queens Village, NY; Midwood HS, Brooklyn, NY; Newcomers HS, Queens, NY; Port Richmond HS, Staten Island, NY; Preparatory Academy for Writers, Queens, NY; Queens Gateway to Health Sciences, Jamaica, NY; Queens High School for Sciences, Queens, NY; Queens HS for Information, Research, Technology, Queens, NY; Queens HS Teaching, Queens, NY; Queens Metropolitan HS, New York, NY; Queens Preparatory Academy, Jamaica, NY; Richmond Hill High School, Richmond Hill, NY; Satellite Academy - Queens, Queens, NY; Talent Unlimited, New York, NY; Thomas Edison, Queens, NY; Townsend Harris, Flushing, NY; Young Women's Leadership School - Astoria, Queens, NY|
|Status: Member since 1967|
|Last Reaffirmed: November 21, 2013|
Most Recent Commission Action:
|November 21, 2013:||To document receipt of the Periodic Review Report, noting that the report necessitated extraordinary effort by the Commission's representatives and staff performing the review. To reaffirm accreditation. The next evaluation visit is scheduled for 2017-2018.|
Brief History Since Last Comprehensive Evaluation:
|June 26, 2008:||To reaffirm accreditation and to request a progress letter, due by April 1, 2009, documenting (1) progress in the implementation of a comprehensive and sustained process for the assessment of student learning outcomes (Standard 14) and (2) progress in the comprehensive review of all course syllabi to ensure that measurable student learning outcomes are stated within all syllabi and are consistent across all sections of a given course (Standard 14). The Periodic Review Report is due June 1, 2013.|
|June 25, 2009:||To accept the progress letter. The Periodic Review Report is due June 1, 2013.|
Next Self-Study Evaluation: 2017 - 2018
Next Periodic Review Report: 2023
Date Printed: December 6, 2013
Branch Campus - A location of an institution that is geographically apart and independent
of the main campus of the institution. The location is independent if the location: offers courses in
educational programs leading to a degree, certificate, or other recognized educational credential; has its own
faculty and administrative or supervisory organization; and has its own budgetary and hiring authority.
Additional Location - A location, other than a branch campus, that is geographically apart from the main campus and at which the institution offers at least 50 percent of an educational program. ANYA ("Approved but Not Yet Active") indicates that the location is included within the scope of accreditation but has not yet begun to offer courses. This designation is removed after the Commission receives notification that courses have begun at this location.
Other Instructional Sites - A location, other than a branch campus or additional location, at which the institution offers one or more courses for credit.
Distance Education Programs - Yes or No indicates whether or not the institution has been approved to offer one or more degree or certificate/diploma programs for which students could meet 50% or more of their requirements by taking distance education courses.
EXPLANATION OF COMMISSION ACTIONS
An institution's accreditation continues unless it is explicitly suspended or removed. In addition to reviewing the institution's accreditation status at least every 5 years, actions are taken for substantive changes (such as a new degree or geographic site, or a change of ownership) or when other events occur that require review for continued compliance. Any type of report or visit required by the Commission is reviewed and voted on by the Commission after it is completed.
In increasing order of seriousness, a report by an institution to the Commission may be accepted, acknowledged, or rejected.
Levels of Actions:
Grant or Re-Affirm Accreditation without follow-up
Defer a decision on initial accreditation: The institution shows promise but the evaluation team has identified issues of concern and recommends that the institution be given a specified time period to address those concerns.
Postpone a decision on (reaffirmation of) accreditation: The Commission has determined that there is insufficient information to substantiate institutional compliance with one or more standards.
Continue accreditation: A delay of up to one year may be granted to ensure a current and accurate representation of the institution or in the event of circumstances beyond the institution’s control (natural disaster, U.S. State Department travel warnings, etc.)
Recommendations to be addressed in the next Periodic Review Report: Suggestions for improvement are given, but no follow-up is needed for compliance.
Supplemental Information Report: This is required when a decision is postponed and are intended only to allow the institution to provide further information, not to give the institution time to formulate plans or initiate remedial action.
Progress report: The Commission needs assurance that the institution is carrying out activities that were planned or were being implemented at the time of a report or on-site visit.
Monitoring report: There is a potential for the institution to become non-compliant with MSCHE standards; issues are more complex or more numerous; or issues require a substantive, detailed report. A visit may or may not be required.
Warning: The Commission acts to Warn an institution that its accreditation may be in jeopardy when the institution is not in compliance with one or more Commission standards and a follow-up report, called a monitoring report, is required to demonstrate that the institution has made appropriate improvements to bring itself into compliance. Warning indicates that the Commission believes that, although the institution is out of compliance, the institution has the capacity to make appropriate improvements within a reasonable period of time and the institution has the capacity to sustain itself in the long term.
Probation: The Commission places an institution on Probation when, in the Commission’s judgment, the institution is not in compliance with one or more Commission standards and that the non-compliance is sufficiently serious, extensive, or acute that it raises concern about one or more of the following:
Probation is often, but need not always be, preceded by an action of Warning or Postponement. If the Commission had previously postponed a decision or placed the institution on Warning, the Commission may place the institution on Probation if it determines that the institution has failed to address satisfactorily the Commission’s concerns in the prior action of postponement or warning regarding compliance with Commission standards. This action is accompanied by a request for a monitoring report, and a special visit follows. Probation may, but need not always, precede an action of Show Cause.
Suspend accreditation: Accreditation has been Continued for one year and an appropriate evaluation is not possible. This is a procedural action that would result in Removal of Accreditation if accreditation cannot be reaffirmed within the period of suspension.
Show cause why the institution's accreditation should not be removed: The institution is required to present its case for accreditation by means of a substantive report and/or an on-site evaluation. A "Public Disclosure Statement" is issued by the Commission.
Remove accreditation. If the institution appeals this action, its accreditation remains in effect until the appeal is completed.
Other actions are described in the Commission policy, "Range of Commission Actions on Accreditation."